Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
1 answer
628 views

Why is $FOLLOW$ not necessary for $LL(1)$ grammars with no $\epsilon$ transitions?

I'm aware of how $FIRST$ and $FOLLOW$ sets are used to construct a parsing table for $LL(1)$ grammars. However, I've encountered this statement from my notes: With $\epsilon$ productions in the ...
Novicegrammer's user avatar