Questions tagged [semi-decidability]

The tag has no usage guidance.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0
votes
0answers
23 views

Semidecidable Turing Machine for L={a,b}*

I have a language L={a,b}* over the alphabet {a,b}. How do I build a Turing Machine that semidecides but does not decide this language? Me and my classmates tried using the macro language to solve ...
2
votes
1answer
45 views

Is this language Recursively Enumerable or Not RE?

$L = \{\langle M, k\rangle : M\;\text{is a Turing Machine and } |\{w \in L(M) : w \in a^*b^*\}| \geq k \}$ My Interpretation of language is that $L$ is a language which contains Turing machine ...
1
vote
1answer
48 views

How can I show that a language is Turing-recognizable and decidable?

I was wondering how I can show that the language $\{a^n b^n c^n \mid n \geq 0 \}$ is Turing-recognizable. Also, if it is Turing-decidable?
0
votes
1answer
52 views

Decidability of the language of all deterministic LBA where all states are reachable

I have a exam task with 3 parts. (b) is no problem. I got a solution for (a) but the way (c) is asked makes me wonder if I even understood (a) (a) L := { < A > | A is a DFSA, where all states are ...
0
votes
1answer
46 views

Decidability of decision problems

Can somebody give intuition how to answer those questions? From one side I can say that most of them are undecidable because we can reduce the halting problem to them (or halting problem can appear ...
0
votes
1answer
109 views

Why is a subset of a undecidable language decidable?

I have problems with the understanding why a subset of a undecidable language is decidable. We've proved in the lecture that $HALT$$_T$$_M$$=${$<M,w>$|M is a TM and M halts on input w} is ...
3
votes
1answer
110 views

Which languages, decided by a turing machine are decidable?

How do I decide if a language is decidable and/or semi-decidable? I have theses languages: a) { < M > | L(M) ⊆ 0*} b) { < M > | L(M) contains at least one word of even length} c) {...
2
votes
1answer
29 views

Turing Machine equivalence in MinTM proof

The proof with contradiction that $MIN_{\mathrm{TM}}$ is not Turing-recognizable from Michael Sipser's textbook "Introduction to the Theory of Computation" (Theorem 6.7) is as follows: $C=$ "On ...
0
votes
1answer
75 views

Is the halting problem undecidable or unrecognizable? [duplicate]

Is the Halting problem in the class of undecidable problems, or it is just in the set of unrecognizable problems? I understand that if it is undecidable, then it is also unrecognizable. I have seen ...
1
vote
2answers
49 views

Is a language whose Turing Machine doesn't halt for some positive cases but for others does not recursive?

Say language $L$ is recursively enumerable, but not recursive. Say $a$ and $b$ are symbols of the alphabet and $w$ a word. Say we have the following language: $L' = \{ aw | w \in L \} \cup \{ bw | w \...
1
vote
1answer
47 views

Is $ L = \{ a^n\ |\ a^n \not\in L_n \} $ Turing recognizable (recursively enumerable)?

Say $ \Sigma = \{a\} $, $M_1, M_2, ... $ is an enumeration of all TMs that recognize languages over $\Sigma$ and $L_1, L_2, ... $ are respectively the languages that are recognized by those TMs. We ...
1
vote
1answer
32 views

Recognizably turing machine question (reject / loop)

The definition of proving recognizability using dove tailing is below. However I'm wondering if we can also prove loop or reject in the same way? Give a deterministic TM D that recognizes L such that ...
3
votes
1answer
61 views

Is the language of all TMs *not* accepting a given string, Enumerable?

Is the following language in RE? $$L = \{\langle M\rangle : M\text{ is a TM that does not accept }010\}$$ I could use Rice's Theorem with the property $P = \{L : 010\text{ is not in }L\}$ to show ...
2
votes
1answer
40 views

How To Show That B is Semi-Decidable Given A

I am preparing for my Computational Theory final and ran into this exact problem : B={ x | there exists a prefix of x that is in A}. Show that B is semi-decidable. In other words, you need to ...
1
vote
1answer
539 views

Is it decidable whether a Turing machine M will reach state q on input s?

Given a turing machine $M$, one of its states $q$ and an input word $w$, will $M$ ever reach $q$ on $w$? As we are not given anything about the word length, I assume that we have a finite length word....
2
votes
1answer
92 views

Prove the languages |L<M>| = 2 and |L<M>| $\not=$ 2 to be non-Turing recognizable or non-recursively enumerable

I am trying to prove the non-recursively enumerable property of two languages. $L_2 = \{\langle M \rangle: |L\langle M \rangle| = 2\}$ and $L_{\not=2} = \{\langle M \rangle: |L\langle M \rangle| \not=...
1
vote
1answer
114 views

Prove Halting on all Inputs is not in RE simulation

I don't understand why when proving if Halting on all inputs problem si not in RE using the complement of the halting problem, I have to take a turing machine and simulate the machine M(the machine ...
1
vote
1answer
53 views

REC and RE under intersection

Would the intersection of a recursive language and a recursively enumarable language be recursive or recurisvely enumbarable or neither? Assume $L_{3}$ is the intersection of some language $L_{1}$ $\...
-3
votes
3answers
113 views

Does undecidability violate Turing completeness? Shouldn't “complete” include “decidability”? [closed]

Does undecidability violate Turing completeness? Shouldn't "complete" include "decidability"? That is, if one has a language that's Turing complete, but expresses infinite computation (i.e. may not ...
1
vote
1answer
88 views

How do I construct a NTM that accepts the language consisting of the coding of turing machines that halt on one input?

I currently have a problem with the following question: Let $L = \{ \langle M \rangle \mid \exists w: \text{$M$ halts for $w$ in at most $|w|^3$ steps} \}$. Construct an NTM (non-deterministic Turing ...
4
votes
1answer
86 views

Is Rice-Shapiro theorem bidirectional?

Rice-Shapiro theorem states that version A Let $\Gamma$ be a set of computably enumerable sets, and $I = \{e : W_e \in \Gamma\}$ its index set in some admissible enumeration of c.e sets. If $I$...
1
vote
1answer
87 views

Can the complement of an unrecognizable language be a recognizable language?

I know that complement of a language that is recursively enumerable, but not recursive, is definitely not recursively enumerable (or unrecognizable). So my question is what can be said about the ...
1
vote
2answers
166 views

Why are not all recursive languages undecidable?

I learned that recursive language are decidable; correct me if I am wrong. However, I have found some arguments that seem to contradict this. These may or may not be correct; please let me know. If ...
0
votes
0answers
28 views

A set that is not recursively enumerable and not (K'≤ A)

Is there a set A such that it's not recursively enumerable and not(K'≤ A) ? where K' is complement of K= {n| φ n (n) halts} Thanks!
0
votes
0answers
31 views

How to know if a lanugae is undecidable or semi-decidable

I recently learnt about undecidable languages and semi-decidable languages. But I am still quite confused on how I can determine if a language is semi-decidable. Is there any standard theorem or axiom ...
3
votes
1answer
111 views

Efficient algorithm to determine if a lambda calculus term is equivalent to one without a given free variable

Consider the following problem: given a lambda calculus term $t$ and free variable $v$ determine whether $\phi(t,v)$, where $\phi(t,v) := \exists t'. t' \equiv t \land v \notin FV(t')$. This problem ...
1
vote
2answers
69 views

Need help understanding what co-recursively enumerable means

Lets say I have a set: $ L = \{\langle G \rangle | L(G) = \Sigma^{\star}\}$ and the question asks if it is co-RE. I know that if something is co-RE, it halts on every input not in L but may or may not ...
1
vote
1answer
45 views

Is the set of context free grammars that generate all words in co-RE?

Is $\{\langle G \rangle | L(G) = \sum^{\star}\}$ in co-RE? $\langle G \rangle$ is the encoding of a context free grammar. My intuition is that this is false.
0
votes
1answer
103 views

Whether language of all turing machines is decidable or undecidable or semi-decidable?

I recently came across this language: $L=\{<TM>| \text{TM accepts recursively enumerable languages}\}$ It was asked in the question to find out whether language L is decidable or undecidable. ...
0
votes
1answer
225 views

Prove/disprove that the class of decidable (resp. partially decidable) languages is closed under symmetric difference

Prove/disprove that the class of decidable (resp. partially decidable) languages is closed under symmetric difference. A symmetric difference of sets A and B is the set (A \ B) ∪ (B \ A). I know that ...
0
votes
1answer
138 views

Proving a set is semi-decidable

Let $S = \{ ⟨M,q⟩ | (\exists x) M $ reaches state $q$ when running $M$ on $x$$\}$, where ⟨M,q⟩ is coded TM M and state q. To prove that $S$ is semi-decidable, I've tried to use the equivalence: ...
2
votes
1answer
535 views

Determining if given languages are regular or recursively enumerable

I came across following problem: Suppose $L_1$ and $L_2$ are two languages, $M$ is a Turing machine $L_1 =\{M|M$ accepts at most 2016 strings$\}$ $L_2=\{M|M$ accepts at least 2016 strings$\}$ ...
1
vote
3answers
383 views

Proof that total computable functions are not enumerable

In an answer to this question, a sketch of the proof that total computable functions are not enumerable is made: Because of diagonalization. If $(f_e:e \in N)$ was a computable enumeration of all ...
2
votes
1answer
51 views

When does an extendible 1:1 p.c. function have a 1:1 computable extension?

A partial computable function $\varphi_e$, defined on a c.e. set $W_e$, is called extendible if there exists some computable function $f$ which extends $\varphi_e$, i.e. $\varphi_e(W_e) = f(W_e)$. My ...
2
votes
1answer
66 views

If Q1 and Q2 are countably enumerable, then is Q1\Q2 countably enumerable?

If Q1 and Q2 are countably enumerable, then is Q1\Q2 countably enumerable? I am reading a text where they claim that this is not the case and ask the reader to come up with a counter example. Can ...
0
votes
1answer
476 views

Why is the intersection of these two Languages Recursively Enumerable, not Recursive?

I am only several days exposed to computational theory, so my understanding is quite slim: in a question, it says that for a regular language L1 and a recursively enumerable but not recursive language ...
-2
votes
1answer
34 views

Show that $L = L_\phi \cup L_{\{\sum^*\}} \notin RE$ with Rice theorem

Show that $L = L_\phi \cup L_{\{\sum^*\}} \notin RE$ with Rice theorem. Well I did show that with reduction, by using $HP'$. Simply by creating a function from $f(\langle M \rangle, x) = (M')$ Thus,...
1
vote
1answer
882 views

What is the difference between undecidable language and Turing Recognizable language?

I was wondering what is the difference difference undecidable language and Turing recognizable language. I've seen in some cases where they ask: Prove that the language $ A_{TM} = \{ \ <M,w> | \...
0
votes
0answers
31 views

How to prove that for a decidable problem the problem and the compliment of the problem are semi-decidable?

Given a decidable problem, how would I go about proofing that the problem and the complement of the problem have to be semi-decidable?
1
vote
1answer
565 views

Closure of Turing-recognizable languages under homomorphism

I've proven that the Turing-recognizable languages are closed under concatenation and I need to show that they are closed under homomorphism. But what's really the difference? Doesn't closure under ...
0
votes
1answer
65 views

Does the language of TM's that repeat a configuration infinite times semi-decidable or not?

Let us define the following languages: $$ {L_1 = \{\langle M\rangle : M \ \text{is a TM and $\exists w\in \Sigma^*$ s.t $M(w)$ repeats a configuration infinite times}\}} $$ $$ L_2 = \{\langle M\...
0
votes
0answers
246 views

Decidability of intersection of two languages of same type

Given two context-sensitive languages, $L_1$ and $L_2$ is the problem of "whether $L_1 \cap L_2$ also belongs to CSL" decidable? I have the same question for the case when $L_1$ and $L_2$ belongs to ...
0
votes
0answers
25 views

Give an example of a language where both L and ¬L is not semidecidable? [duplicate]

I know ¬H is not semidecidable so I was thinking of creating a language that combines both H and ¬H. Therefore L would be undecidable for ¬H and ¬L would be undecidable for H. Is this a proper ...
0
votes
2answers
46 views

Function whose domain is strictly included in its range

Hi I'm doing some exercices on reductions and one of them is like this: My problem rather than doing the reduction is understanding it. For the positive case I want that if Mx(x) never stops then p'...
0
votes
0answers
38 views

Is the language below not decidable , if yes , it is then R.E ?

I am given a Turing machine M as input and i have to find out if this language below decidable and if not is it then in this case recursively enumerable . $$L=\\\{<M> \mid \text{ is ...
0
votes
1answer
80 views

Prove that an infinite set is semidecidible

I have been asked to prove that: Being C an infinite set. Prove that C is semidecidable if and only if exists a total computable function that is injective and whose image is C. I've read the ...
2
votes
1answer
109 views

Completeness problem of TM

$L = \{ \langle M \rangle \mid L(M) = \Sigma^∗ \}$ Is above problem R.E ? I found an explanation in one of the websites and I have doubt in few lines of paragraph. The explanation was Now, given a ...
1
vote
1answer
511 views

If a problem is “not semi-decidable” and “not decidable” can we say it is “undecidable”?

I was under impression that when a Language (or problem) is not semi-decidable and not decidable then we can say it's undecidable and I think it makes sense also based on diagram. However, in my ...
0
votes
0answers
85 views

Decidability of {(M,w); M terminates on input w and tape of M is empty after computation}

I am currently trying to prove whether the above language is decidable, partially decidable or fully undecidable. I am certain that this language is partially decidable and reducible to the halting ...
0
votes
0answers
169 views

Turing machine accepts two different strings

I am having hard time to proving this problem $C=\{\langle M \rangle \mid M \text{ is a Turing Machine , } L(M) \text { only contains two different strings}\}$ some ideas that i have tried are : i ...