Skip to main content
2 of 2
added 141 characters in body; edited tags
Yuval Filmus
  • 279.1k
  • 27
  • 316
  • 512

Given two DFA's accepting the same language, does one have to refine the other?

I have a logical question that I can't quite crack:

Given two automata accepting the same language $L$, does one have to refine the other?

In other words, if $A_1$ and $A_2$ both accept $L$, with associated equivalence relations $R_{A_1}$ and $R_{A_2}$, does $R_{A_1}$ have to refine $R_{A_2}$, or vice versa?

I am leaning toward the answer yes because if we have a regular language $L$ which is accepted by an automaton $A$, we can show that the relation $R_A$ refines the relation $R_L$, meaning $R_A \sqsubseteq R_L$, which means that both $R_{A_1} \sqsubseteq R_L$ and $R_{A_2} \sqsubseteq R_L$.

We are currently studying the Myhill-Nerode Theorem, so I'm guessing it has something to do with it. I've tried combining few theorems together, but came out empty.

Ben
  • 11
  • 1