Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions about problems which cannot be solved by any Turing machine.
2
votes
1
answer
2k
views
Is $L(G) \subseteq L(R)$ decidable?
Is the following problem decidable?
Given a context-free grammar $G$ and a regular expression $R$, is $L(G) \subseteq L(R)$?
It is given that the following problem is undecidable
Given a co …
1
vote
1
answer
93
views
Is $ L = \{ a^n\ |\ a^n \not\in L_n \} $ Turing recognizable (recursively enumerable)?
Say $ \Sigma = \{a\} $, $M_1, M_2, ... $ is an enumeration of all TMs that recognize languages over $\Sigma$ and $L_1, L_2, ... $ are respectively the languages that are recognized by those TMs. We …
1
vote
1
answer
130
views
Is $L = \{ \langle \langle \ M\ \rangle \rangle \ | \ M \ \text{does not accept}\ 010 \} $ T...
I'm working on the following problem:
Is the following language Turing recognizable (recursively enumerable)
?
$$L = \{ \langle \langle \ M\ \rangle \rangle \ | \ M \ \text{does not
> acce …