Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with proof-assistants
Search options not deleted
user 12623
Applications that allow to create formal proofs. They assist the user by finding partial and checking complete proofs. General questions about proof assistants can also be asked on the Proof Assistants Stack Exchange site.
3
votes
Explanation of proof of why connectedness is not conjunctively local of any order $k$
For the sake of an exercise I want to explain my understanding (and to provide a alternative explanation).
When $\psi_{CONNECTED}$ computes whether something is connected or not, each predicate $\var …
- 3,090
5
votes
2
answers
150
views
Explanation of proof of why connectedness is not conjunctively local of any order $k$
I was reading Minsky's and Papert's book on perceptrons and I was reading theorem 0.6.1 and I was having a hard time understanding it. The theorem was about proving that the property "connected" was n …
- 3,090