Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with algorithm-analysis
Search options not deleted
user 21755
Questions about the science and art of determining properties of algorithms, often including correctness, runtime and space usage. Use the [runtime-analysis] tag for questions about the runtime of algorithms.
1
vote
0
answers
744
views
Prove the correctness of Tarjan's off-line least-common-ancestors algorithm
Tarjan's off-line least-common-ancestors algorithm is given as follows:
LCA($u$)
Make-Set($u$)
Find-Set($u$).$ancestor$ = $u$
for each child $v$ of $u$ in $T$
$\quad$ LCA($v$)
$ …
- 493