Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with co-np
Search options not deleted
user 42673
Question about the complexity class that is a complement of NP, i.e. decision problems where the "no" instances can be accepted by a nondeterministic Turing machine that runs in time polynomial in the length of the input.
0
votes
2
answers
372
views
How does a co-NP problem differ from an NP (its complement) one?
I have quite a hard time understanding co-NP problems.
If we can reduce every problem to decision problem. NP problems should accept YES instances -> instances where the answer is yes. So for example …
- 179