Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with natural-language-processing
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 45112
Natural language processing (NLP)
7
votes
Semantic readings of the Lambek sequent calculus
What constitutes a proof in a system like this is a derivation which is a tree of rule applications. The above translation function is defined by (structural) recursion over that tree. Note, this is w …
- 12.1k
6
votes
Accepted
How to express modalities in lambda calculus - are some extensions required?
Are extensions required? Not really. You can take an axiomatic description of a modal logic and simply provide a "primitive" lambda term for each. The modal operators would become type constructors. H …
- 12.1k