Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with numerical-analysis
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 45112
1
vote
How to test for overflow when multiplying floats
I want to further emphasize and underscore gnasher729's comment which is completely correct. NaN and Infinity were added exactly so you wouldn't need to do such checks all the time. That is, they were …
- 12.1k
4
votes
Accepted
Do formulas involving fewer repetitions of variables give higher numerical precision?
First, I want to say that it is not the case in general that an algorithm that minimizes the number of uses of the inputs is more accurate, at least for IEEE 754 floating point. For example, compensa …
- 12.1k