Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with regular-languages
Search options not deleted
user 5331
Questions about properties of the class of regular languages and individual languages.
1
vote
0
answers
130
views
Can regular expression captures be matched by a CFG being simulated by an $LR(k)$ parser?
I have seen this question: Are regular expressions $LR(k)$? and my question is slightly related.
Suppose I have a regular expression:
RE=(aa)?(aa)
and I convert it to a grammar:
G ::= A B
A ::= C | …
- 121