Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with context-free
Search options not deleted
user 57091
Questions about the set of languages (equivalently) described by context-free grammars or accepted by (non-deterministic) pushdown automata.
-1
votes
How to prove that Ambiguity is still present in Resolved Production of Dangling Else Problem?
To prove some Grammar is Ambiguous You have find Atleast 2 or more $LMD or RMD$(Left or right most derivative tree) for a string $w$ which belongs to the grammar.
There is small catch here, it is not …
- 9