Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with time-complexity
Search options not deleted
user 60766
The amount of time resources (number of atomic operations or machine steps) required to solve a problem expressed in terms of input size. If your question concerns algorithm analysis, use the [runtime-analysis] tag instead. If your question concerns whether or not a computation will *ever* finish, use the [computability] tag instead. Time-complexity is perhaps the most important sub-topic of complexity theory.
8
votes
2
answers
6k
views
Can we do better than $O(n\log n)$ building a balanced binary tree?
I'm (foolishly it turns out) confident that the answer to this question is no. So why am I asking?
Because Dr. Aleksandar Prokopec at EPFL in his parallel programming course introduces a data-structu …
- 225