Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions about decision problems that can be solved on nondeterministic Turing machines in time polynomial in the length of the input.
2
votes
2
answers
128
views
Why do we prove X is in NP to prove it is NP-complete?
The steps to show something is NP-complete is to show it is a member of NP, and then show an NP-complete problem reduces to it in polynomial-time. Why is the first step necessary? … Is it possible to reduce an NP-hard problem to an NP-complete problem in polynomial time? Because that would be the only instance in which this is important. …