Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with numerical-analysis
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 66162
3
votes
1
answer
714
views
numerically stable log1pexp calculation
What are good approximations for computing log1pexp for single precision and double precision floating point numbers?
Note: log1pexp(x) is log(1 + exp(x))
I have found few implementations of log1pex …
- 275
5
votes
5
answers
580
views
fast and stable x * tanh(log1pexp(x)) computation
$$f(x) = x \tanh(\log(1 + e^x))$$
The function (mish activation) can be easily implemented using a stable log1pexp without any significant loss of precision. Unfortunately, this is computationally he …
- 275