Timeline for Why isnt node checked for nil value in start when transplanting binary tree
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| May 12, 2016 at 12:52 | vote | accept | Abhinav Garg | ||
| May 12, 2016 at 12:00 | answer | added | Yuval Filmus | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 12, 2016 at 8:34 | history | edited | Abhinav Garg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added Context and formatted literal quotes.
|
| May 12, 2016 at 7:40 | comment | added | greybeard |
Please put into words purpose and context of TRANSPLANT. (Suggest reviewing the title: CLRS TRANSPLANT RB(?) tree nodes: NIL check for 2nd node)
|
|
| May 12, 2016 at 7:38 | comment | added | Raphael |
Please clarify which parts of your question are literal quotes and which are yours. Use the blockquote Markdown element (>).
|
|
| May 12, 2016 at 7:10 | history | edited | Abhinav Garg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Told the location of code and detail about the book
|
| May 11, 2016 at 20:45 | comment | added | D.W.♦ | 1. Looks like there's a typo in line 6. Since you're asking about line 6, that might be important. Can you edit to fix it? 2. Have you tried working through an example, to see if you can find a counterexample where this seems to do the wrong thing? It's not clear to me why you think it needs to be checked earlier, so an example would help. 3. Have you checked the errata for CLRS? | |
| S May 11, 2016 at 16:11 | history | suggested | reinierpost | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I had to look up CLRS
|
| May 11, 2016 at 14:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 11, 2016 at 16:11 | |||||
| May 11, 2016 at 14:28 | review | First posts | |||
| May 12, 2016 at 3:37 | |||||
| May 11, 2016 at 14:25 | history | asked | Abhinav Garg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |