Timeline for In context of data mining, what does it mean for an association rule measure to be maximal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2013 at 18:03 | history | edited | Raphael |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 14, 2013 at 22:24 | answer | added | mhum | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 13, 2013 at 6:20 | comment | added | user1008 | I read it in the following paper infolab.stanford.edu/~sergey/dic.html . If you search for "conviction is truly a measure of implication because it is directional, it is maximal for perfect implications". This is the statement I cannot make out | |
| Jan 13, 2013 at 5:52 | comment | added | AJed | but usually, a maximal subset $S$ with certain charatestics is a subset such that there is no other subset $S'$ with the same characteristics and $S \subset S$. That is, cannot extended anymore. | |
| Jan 13, 2013 at 5:49 | comment | added | AJed | can you be more precise ? where did you read this ? | |
| Jan 13, 2013 at 5:43 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 13, 2013 at 7:54 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2013 at 5:23 | history | asked | user1008 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |