4
$\begingroup$

Sistla/Clarke proved [SC82] that the LTL model-checking problem is PSpace-complete. Sometimes people write that this problem is "PSpace-hard in $|\phi|$" (e.g. [LP85]). What does this mean formally?

How to prove that a decision problem that has several parameters (here, $\phi$ and system) is PSpace-hard in one of the parameters? I guess we would need to poly-time reduce some PSpace-complete problem to our problem with the unintereseting parameter being fixed, while the interesting parameter can vary.

But the original proof of Sistla/Clarke [Lemma 4.4, SC82] does not do the thing above! In their proof, both parameters of the resulting LTL model-checking problem instance depend on $n$, where $n$ is the TM tape bound. Is there a proof that fixes one of the parameters?

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

You are certainly right that the level of rigor found in old papers making such claims can be a bit low at times when viewed from today's perspective.

The claim is correct anyway, even if it does not follow from Sistla/Clarke's proof. The reason is that LTL satisfiability checking is also PSPACE-complete. You can see satisfiability checking as a special case of model checking.

More formally, you want to prove the following: There exists a fixed model such that given an LTL formula, checking if the formula holds on the model is PSPACE-hard. Now the satisfiability checking problem does not restrict the number of atomic propositions, so a fixed model does not do the trick. However, S. Demri and P. Schnoebelen show in the paper "The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics in simple cases" (Inf. Comput., 174(1):84–103, 2002) that the satisfiability problem is hard even if we only have a single atomic proposition.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.