2
$\begingroup$

I am trying to prove that following decison variation of MaxSAT is both NP hard and co-NP hard. $(\phi ,k) \in L$ iff an assignment of $\phi$ satisfies k clauses and no assignment satisfies more than k clauses.

I think we can show that NP hardness by reducing SAT to L by setting k=m (number of clauses). But I can't reduce $\overline{SAT}$ to L. Is that reduction possible?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Given a $\overline{SAT}$ instance $\psi$ with $m$ clauses, let $\phi$ be the formula formed by adding to each clause a new variable $x$ (the same for all clauses), and a new clause $\bar{x}$. If $\psi$ is satisfiable then $\phi$ is satisfiable, whereas if $\psi$ is unsatisfiable then the maximum number of clauses that can be satisfied is $m$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.