How can we solve summation of asymptotic notations like given below: $$ \sum_{k=1}^{n-1} O(n). $$
2 Answers
You should be very careful when summing up a variable number of terms in asymptotic notation, as the result actually depends on the hidden constants.
Consider the following example: $f_i(n) = i\cdot n$ for all integers $i$ and $n$. Then, for any integer $i$, $f_i(n) \in O(n)$.
If you are not careful, you could end up writing something like: $$\sum_{i=1}^n f_i(n) = \sum_{i=1}^n O(n) = O(\sum_{i=1}^n n) = O(n^2).$$ And get $O(n^2)$. But this is totally wrong!
If you do the computation without the asymptotic notation, you get: $$\sum_{i=1}^n f_i(n) = \sum_{i=1}^n i\cdot n = n\sum_{i=1}^n i = n\frac{n(n+1)}{2} = \frac{n^2(n+1)}{2}.$$ And this is not in $O(n^2)$, as it is in $\Theta(n^3)$.
Now some authors define $\sum_{i=1}^n O(n)$ as meaning that the hidden constants are the same for every $O$ and in this case you can sum things together. But this is not always the case so I recommend not using $O$ notation with variable-length sums (as well as when doing induction, where similar problems appear).
To express the sum over k in big o notation, use the formulae that express the sum of the $i$th powers of the first $n$ positive integers as a polynomial of degree $i+1$.
For example, $\sum_{k=1}^n k$ is the quadratic function $n(n+1)/2 = O(n^2)$. The sum $\sum_{k=1}^n k^2$ is a cubic polynomial in $n$ and hence is $O(n^3)$, etc.
-
1$\begingroup$ Be careful, $O$ notation can be quite treacherous and doing stuff like this can lead to false results! (see my answer) $\endgroup$– TassleCommented Nov 20, 2019 at 15:32