Adleman's theorem gives $$\mathsf{BPP\subseteq P/Poly}.$$
Why is this theorem considered progenitor to derandomization conjecture that $\mathsf{P=BPP}$?
Does it mean Adleman's result could be considered as evidence $$\mathsf{BPP\subseteq P/Log}$$ is a realistic possibility?
Anaalogously, does it mean $$\mathsf{NP\subseteq P/Poly}$$ could be considered as evidence $$\mathsf{NP\subseteq P/Log}$$ is a realistic possibility?
Is there a satifactory answer without considering Impagliazzo-Wigderson's conditional $\mathsf{P=BPP}$ result?