Representing numeric values using positional notation is one of the milestones in the history of arithmetic. Babylons used a base 60 system, Maya a base 20 system; base 10 system became "the standard" used by modern civilizations; digital computers use the Binary numeral system, ....
But if we look at nature, we found that life itself "heavily rely" on an alphabet of 4 symbols: the DNA has four (chemical) bases: adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine (A, C, G, T) that are used to store the "instructions and information" to generate and drive the parts of a living organism.
But on a higher level, are there "natural algorithms" (algorithms found in natural processes, in animal behaviours or in everyday human behaviours) that take advantages of "numeral systems" other than the unary representation.
To be more precise I would like to know whether or not natural processes or living creatures make use of a finite, discrete alphabet of "symbols" and use them in a manner similar to a positional notation: the symbols are placed together and used as a whole to represent "something" (an action, an information, an object, ...) among many other possibilites ... a sort of "index" in an exponential number of possibilites.
Another (obvious) non numeric example is the human language where (in general) a combination of finite number of sounds ("alphabet") are combined to form the words.