Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with formal-languages
Search options not deleted
user 71910
Questions related to formal languages, grammars, and automata theory
0
votes
0
answers
37
views
Proof that {w ∈ {a, b} ∗ | |w|a = |w|b} is not a regular language [duplicate]
I know that the language {w ∈ {a, b}∗| |w|a = |w|b} is not regular since somehow, you can't store all the information needed in a DFA. I've seen that normally it's done with reduction to absurdity or …
D.W.♦
- 166k