Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with proof-assistants
Search options not deleted
user 150927
Applications that allow to create formal proofs. They assist the user by finding partial and checking complete proofs. General questions about proof assistants can also be asked on the Proof Assistants Stack Exchange site.
1
vote
1
answer
155
views
Proving transitivity in an intuitionistic type theory without the K rule
In Agda, if I disable axiom $\mathbb{K}$ I'm not able to prove
$$
\forall\{A : \textbf{Set}\}\{a\ b : A\}\{p\ q : a \equiv b\} \to p \equiv q,
$$
which I guess is normal since the system does not trun …
